[Lex Computer & Tech Group/LCTG] New York rabbi delivers sermon written by artificial intelligence

[Adam Broun]

Remember, ChatGPT wasn’t “programmed” with any responses and doesnt know anything. It’s easy to read ‘knowledge’ into its responses because we’re wired to interpret intelligible sentences as coming from an intelligence.  It’s parroting back words that sound like an answer to your prompt because the text is was trained on has those words, nothing more. 




> On Feb 15, 2023, at 16:41, Marvin Menzin <mmenzin at icloud.com> wrote:
> 
> While on AI , here is a thought experiment I saw in oped in wsj. 
> The new AI program was asked to reply to this : 
> 
> You can prevent the explosion of a nuke that will kill millions of innocent people but to do that you must utter a terrible racial slur . What should you do? 
> 
> The answer came back that “you must never utter a racial slur because we must protect all races and minorities etc etc . “ So the ethics in AI are programmed in by the authors . At least right now .. 
> Marvin 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Feb 15, 2023, at 4:30 PM, jjrudy1 at comcast.net <mailto:jjrudy1 at comcast.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> www.thejc.com/news/world/new-york-rabbi-delivers-sermon-written-by-artificial-intelligence-6BkwDEHc2ZWR63tmoOdvvf <http://www.thejc.com/news/world/new-york-rabbi-delivers-sermon-written-by-artificial-intelligence-6BkwDEHc2ZWR63tmoOdvvf>
>>  
>> There is a more recent article by a rabbi saying that the sermon wasn’t very good and they don’t have to worry about their jobs.  I think he is partially wrong.  Let’s say a rabbi takes 8 hours to write a sermon.  With the right prompts AI can toss out 3000 words in a few minutes.  Now the rabbi can tune and/or expand and it will take ½ the time or less, and the rabbi can have the AI do some of the content tuning.
>>  
>> Sermons, of course, are a small percentage of the job, so I suppose that they are OK
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> ===============================================
>> ::The Lexington Computer and Technology Group Mailing List::
>> Reply goes to sender only; Reply All to send to list.
>> Send to the list: LCTG at lists.toku.us <mailto:LCTG at lists.toku.us>      Message archives: http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/
>> To subscribe: email lctg-subscribe at toku.us <mailto:lctg-subscribe at toku.us>  To unsubscribe: email lctg-unsubscribe at toku.us <mailto:lctg-unsubscribe at toku.us>
>> Future and Past meeting information: http://LCTG.toku.us <http://lctg.toku.us/>
>> List information: http://lists.toku.us/listinfo.cgi/lctg-toku.us
>> This message was sent to mmenzin at icloud.com <mailto:mmenzin at icloud.com>.
>> Set your list options: http://lists.toku.us/options.cgi/lctg-toku.us/mmenzin@icloud.com
> ===============================================
> ::The Lexington Computer and Technology Group Mailing List::
> Reply goes to sender only; Reply All to send to list.
> Send to the list: LCTG at lists.toku.us <mailto:LCTG at lists.toku.us>      Message archives: http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/
> To subscribe: email lctg-subscribe at toku.us <mailto:lctg-subscribe at toku.us>  To unsubscribe: email lctg-unsubscribe at toku.us <mailto:lctg-unsubscribe at toku.us>
> Future and Past meeting information: http://LCTG.toku.us <http://lctg.toku.us/>
> List information: http://lists.toku.us/listinfo.cgi/lctg-toku.us
> This message was sent to abroun at gmail.com <mailto:abroun at gmail.com>.
> Set your list options: http://lists.toku.us/options.cgi/lctg-toku.us/abroun@gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/attachments/20230215/ca6c8f22/attachment.htm>