[Lex Computer & Tech Group/LCTG] Reactiona from home to today's meeting
Harry Forsdick
forsdick at gmail.com
Wed Dec 11 08:54:32 PST 2024
I am writing down my impressions about today's meeting from the perspective
of a remote user being involved in a meeting.
I encourage others who were remote today to respond to these suggestions
with your own impressions: feel free to add to or negate what I am saying
below.
-- Harry
Here are some reactions to the meeting today. I am writing these in order
of observation. Some of the early comments are corrected or improved by the
later comments.
1. Initial setup in room 237 is good: there are only a couple of schemes
of use (x?, y? and Hybrid -- which is what we want to use), and that is
good. The improvements recommended here are intended to be to the small
number of setups -- and in fact only got the Hybrid scheme because that is
the only one I have any experience with
2. Sound from Presenter and Audience is muffled. More for the
Audience. Possible improvement for Presenter is a microphone at front to
be closer -- or a lavalier mic to be fed through a mixer to make it part of
the one audio stream coming out of the room and thus able to take advantage
of the Zoom echo cancellation.
3. Zooming on the Presenter is ineffective because it zooms too much,
missing the head of the presenter. Her own webcam is much better.
Following the presenter around the room is not needed.
4. There might be better use of the cameras to not have them zoom, but
rather focus on particular parts of the room:
1. Aimed at the front where the presenter will be (performed by the
camera at the rear of the room)
2. Aimed at the front half of the audience (performed by, say, the
front left camera)
3. Aimed at the back half of the audience (performed by, say, the
front right camera)
5. There is no need for the meeting room Zoom display to have one
participant shown in the upper right corner because that has nothing to do
with who is speaking. It looks like the first participant in the conference
is chosen arbitrarily to be in this spot. It doesn't serve any purpose in
the meeting room.
6. Cross talking in the meeting room is really annoying because the
audio of coming out of the room is already very difficult to listen to.
7. 12 people in the meeting room audience, 10 in the remote audience.
8. This new system, which cost a LOT of money, is better in some ways
than our ($800) homebrew system (ease of setup so that anybody can run this
system and it is permanently installed. This is huge. It means that
anybody in the group can control the meeting, not just a couple of people.
9. When the meeting room audience asked a question, the zoomable camera
tried to find the person, but the camera only localized the back of the
head of the speaker. This is pretty disappointing. That is why I suggest
a reallocation of the roles of the cameras.
10. Even with all of my complaints about audio and zooming video, the
combination of all the features, warts and all, is better than we've had
before -- largely because it could be so easy to start the hybrid meeting,
11. Remote attendees' voices are still excellent -- illustrating how bad
the sound is from the meeting room.
12. I think it would be better to make the rear camera fixed non zooming
so that there is one camera that can see all of the audience, even if it
isn't their face. Let the presenter's image come from their laptop. Devote
one of the left and right cameras to the noise source, and leave out the
third camera because it takes up too much space in the Hollywood squares
grid. *It would be really good to have two or three streams coming out
of the meeting room so that each of the room cameras could occupy the full
area of a video stream.*
Harry Forsdick <http://www.forsdick.com/resume/>
Town Meeting Member Precinct 7 <http://lexingtontmma.org/>
harry at forsdick.com
<https://mail.google.com/mail/?view=cm&fs=1&tf=1&to=harry@forsdick.com>
www.forsdick.com
46 Burlington St.
Lexington, MA 02420 <https://goo.gl/xZXT2F>
(781) 799-6002 (mobile) <callto:17817996002>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/attachments/20241211/6badfcb4/attachment.htm>
More information about the LCTG
mailing list