[Lex Computer & Tech Group/LCTG] Re. AI as a visual geometry problem solver

[Robert Primak]

 Let's not overthink this one. The diagram could also be using non-Euclidian geometry. 
But I'm thinking the problem is from a high school geometry test, so that it would not be correct to assume anything other than planar, Euclidian geometry, and not a projection of any kind. I missed the significance of the tick marks, which make it impossible for the "vertical" line to be in fact truly vertical. The angles are indeed 80-degrees and 100-degrees, making solving for the top angles trivial. I drew the scaled model to convince myself that this is a correct interpretation. 
-- Bob Primak

    On Saturday, February 21, 2026 at 06:51:05 PM EST, Jon Dreyer via LCTG <lctg at lists.toku.us> wrote:  
 
  
Surely we can stretch the problem in all sorts of ways: maybe it's not planar, maybe apparently straight lines aren't straight, maybe it's on the surface of a sphere, maybe the x is a Roman numeral 10, etc. But there is a fairly standard language of geometry diagrams. Typically, geometry diagrams are assumed planar unless we're told otherwise, and lines that appear straight are assumed straight unless we're told otherwise. But angles that look right cannot be assumed to be right angles unless they have that little right-angle-indicator square at the vertex.
 
So according to this fairly standard interpretation, there's only one right answer. Of course the problem is (probably intentionally) misleading because the 80° angle does look closer to 90°.
 
- 
 
 
 Jon Dreyer
 Math Tutor/Computer Science Tutor
 Jon Dreyer Music
 On 2/21/26 17:28, Richard Wagner via LCTG wrote:
  
 

Just saw this emailed problem and accompanying thread, etc. I am in Bob's corner to the extent that the problem is not simple. Not enough information is given in the problem and assumptions must be made where different assumptions can be correct!
 
Is the object planar or are we seeing a 3D projection of it. If the latter, are we viewing it where one side is planar from our vantage? If the right side is planar to us, then the answer is 30 degrees from the law of sum of angles in a triangle and the angle at the bisection of the vertical line and horizontal line appears to be  90 degrees. (From the Pythagorean Theorem {a squared + b squared = c squared}, the ratio of the sides is 1:square root of 3:2 for opposite sides of a 30:60:90 degree triangle. I'll never forget this ratio and formula from high school ad nauseam). If we're seeing the left triangle as a planar projection of a 3D object, the angle of the left triangle at the vertical/horizontal bisection must be 80 degrees for the given isosceles triangle. This leaves the angle on the other side of this bisection open to question. Naively, one would assume it to be 100 degrees, if one assumes the "horizontal" line to be straight, and x to therefore be 20 degrees. However, one can't assume the bottom line to be horizontal if the object is a projection, and from the information given we can't determine angle at the vertical/horizontal bisection for the triangle on the right side of the projection.
 
Thus, I think the problem is unsolvable from the information given, and I'm not surprised that AI is confused and gave conflicting results. I agree with Olga: be cognizant to what AI is doing and don't summarily assume it is giving correct answers to your queries and conversations.
 
-Dick
 - ===============================================
::The Lexington Computer and Technology Group Mailing List::
Reply goes to sender only; Reply All to send to list.
Send to the list: LCTG at lists.toku.us      Message archives: http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/
To subscribe: email lctg-subscribe at toku.us  To unsubscribe: email lctg-unsubscribe at toku.us
Future and Past meeting information: http://LCTG.toku.us
List information: http://lists.toku.us/listinfo.cgi/lctg-toku.us
This message was sent to bobprimak at yahoo.com.
Set your list options: http://lists.toku.us/options.cgi/lctg-toku.us/bobprimak@yahoo.com
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/attachments/20260222/ffda9857/attachment.htm>