[Lex Computer & Tech Group/LCTG] Astrology: The Perfect Application of AI

Sun Jul 9 15:26:46 PDT 2023

 Charlie, 
I looked into what astrologers think of AI generated astrology. The results were mixed, but rather interesting. Unfortunately, I didn't save my search results. Along the way I think I looked at what ChatGPT said about why people believe in astrology. Again, I didn't save the results or the reference. 
-- Bob Primak

    On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 05:32:17 PM EDT, Charles H. Holbrow <cholbrow at colgate.edu> wrote:  

 Now ask ChatGPT “Wwhy do  people believe in astrology 

On Jul 8, 2023, at 9:40 PM, Robert Primak <bobprimak at yahoo.com> wrote:

 If you want to believe, believe.
If you prefer the human touch, don't use the AI. 
But if you want to make money with the least expense, AI is the only way to go.
Remember, the practice of astrology in the US and Canada must include the disclaimer that the readings are presented for entertainment purposes only, and should not be relied upon to make legal, financial or medical decisions. Any other representation would in Quebec Canada (especially Montreal) run afoul of their "vagrancy laws".  "Vagrancy" in Quebec means theft by deception. New York City also has specific laws about the conduct of astrologers, psychics and other charlatans. This is partly to prevent the scam where soothsayers claim a victim's money is "cursed", and they must present all of it to the seer to be "cleansed". Well, the money does get laundered... 
AI in finance is about as reliable as investing in cryptocurrency or NFTs. 
-- Bob Primak 

    On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 12:03:57 PM EDT, Harry Forsdick <forsdick at gmail.com> wrote:  

 Check the enclosed article.  Sounds like this might be a marriage made in heaven:    
   - Astrology, a pseudoscience
   - Machine Learning AI, no one can come up with an easy to understand description of how it works.
By the way, here is how ChatGPT responds when asked the question "Can you describe why scientists dislike astrology?":

Scientists generally dislike astrology because it is based on the belief that the positions and movements of celestial objects can influence human behavior and personality traits. While astrology has a long historical and cultural significance, most scientists view it as pseudoscience rather than a valid scientific practice.

Here are a few reasons why scientists tend to be skeptical of astrology:

1. Lack of empirical evidence: Astrology's claims are largely anecdotal and lack rigorous scientific evidence to support them. Scientific research relies on repeatable experimentation and observation, which astrology does not meet.

2. Incompatible with known laws of physics: Astrology often makes claims that are inconsistent with our current understanding of the universe and the laws of physics. Scientific theories, such as gravity, electromagnetism, and the principles of astronomy, do not support astrological claims.

3. Confirmation bias and subjective interpretations: Astrology's success depends on individuals' ability to selectively interpret vague and general horoscopes in a way that resonates with their own lives. It is prone to confirmation bias, where people tend to focus on information that confirms their existing beliefs.

4. Lack of reliability and predictability: Astrological predictions are often vague and open to interpretation, making them difficult to test and evaluate objectively. Science thrives on making accurate and testable predictions, which astrology has consistently failed to provide.

5. Cultural and historical origins: Astrology has been part of human history for centuries, but its origins lie in ancient belief systems and cosmologies that are no longer considered scientifically valid. Science has evolved to rely on evidence-based explanations rather than outdated traditions.

It is important to note that while scientists criticize astrology as a scientific practice, they respect individuals' personal beliefs and choices. The scientific community's skepticism towards astrology stems from its lack of scientific validity rather than an attempt to discredit personal beliefs.

OK.  That last "kumbaya" paragraph seems unnecessary, but maybe it's just my cantankerous self showing through.
Now I wonder "What do people who believe in astrology think about machine learning AI"

People who believe in astrology may have different opinions about machine learning AI. Some may see it as a tool or resource that can enhance their understanding of astrology and provide more accurate predictions. They may appreciate the advanced algorithms and data analysis capabilities of AI to uncover hidden patterns and correlations in astrology. Others, however, may view machine learning AI as a threat or challenge to traditional astrological beliefs. They may be concerned that relying on AI could devalue the intuitive and personal aspects of astrology and replace human interpretation with purely data-driven predictions. Ultimately, individual opinions may vary greatly among those who believe in astrology.

Hmm...
Regards,
-- Harry

| Harry Forsdick
Lexington Photo Scanning
Town Meeting Member Precinct 7
harry at forsdick.com
www.forsdick.com
 |   | 46 Burlington St.
Lexington, MA 02420
(781) 799-6002 (mobile)
meet.jit.si/HarryForsdick (video)
Click to see my other websites
 |

===============================================
::The Lexington Computer and Technology Group Mailing List::
Reply goes to sender only; Reply All to send to list.
Send to the list: LCTG at lists.toku.us      Message archives: http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/
To subscribe: email lctg-subscribe at toku.us  To unsubscribe: email lctg-unsubscribe at toku.us
Future and Past meeting information: http://LCTG.toku.us
List information: http://lists.toku.us/listinfo.cgi/lctg-toku.us
This message was sent to bobprimak at yahoo.com.
Set your list options: http://lists.toku.us/options.cgi/lctg-toku.us/bobprimak@yahoo.com
  <How A.I. Is Influencing Astrology - The New York Times.pdf>===============================================
::The Lexington Computer and Technology Group Mailing List::
Reply goes to sender only; Reply All to send to list.
Send to the list: LCTG at lists.toku.us      Message archives: http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/
To subscribe: email lctg-subscribe at toku.us  To unsubscribe: email lctg-unsubscribe at toku.us
Future and Past meeting information: http://LCTG.toku.us
List information: http://lists.toku.us/listinfo.cgi/lctg-toku.us
This message was sent to cholbrow at colgate.edu.
Set your list options: http://lists.toku.us/options.cgi/lctg-toku.us/cholbrow@colgate.edu

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/attachments/20230709/b83905de/attachment.htm>