[Lex Computer & Tech Group/LCTG] Looking for sites blocked by paywalls or remove-ad-blockers

Richard Wagner r.w.wagner at verizon.net
Mon Nov 13 11:53:34 PST 2023


To me, circumventing ads and gaining access to web content that the web 
site spent resources to establish are two different "beasts". I want 
access to the web content, so paying for it has an ethical and, likely, 
a copyright aspect to it. I DID NOT request a popup ad that requires 
that I must disable my ad-blocker in order to gain access to the 
information I am seeking. My assumption has been that the ad-blocker is 
present to eliminate malware, viruses, etc. that may exist in the ad (am 
I incorrect in this assumption?). Thus, I would like to learn how to 
circumvent such ad-blocker turnoff requests without turning my 
ad-blocker off! Incidentally, I have no (or maybe a little) problem with 
ads that accompany the content I am wishing to peruse. I have lived with 
this annoyance my whole life: radio, TV, newspapers, magazines, web-site 
content, etc.

Dick

On 11/13/2023 2:23 PM, David Lees via LCTG wrote:
> George,
> Perhaps micropayments and whatever the software infrastructure for 
> them would be a good topic for an LCTG talk?  Maybe you have already 
> had one of those in the past, but hopefully, it is an area that is 
> changing, because I know they (the payment processing costs) used to 
> be expensive. But, agreed it would be great if you could pay a small 
> amount by the article rather than a subscription.  I know for 
> technical articles, the cost per article is rather high for an 
> individual, but given the potential volume for news and mass 
> distribution material, why not have 25 or 50 cents per article?
>
> David Lees
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 2:10 PM George Gamota <ggamota at stma-llc.com> 
> wrote:
>
>     I understand the ethics if you access a website a lot bypassing
>     paying, but what I find an issue, is when you have one article
>     that might be of interest, say published by Kansas City Tribune.
>     You don’t want to pay and read  articles published by them daily.
>     So maybe there could a payment say of $.50 to read that one article.
>
>     Just a thought
>
>     George
>
>     *From:* LCTG <lctg-bounces+ggamota=stma-llc.com at lists.toku.us> *On
>     Behalf Of *carllazarus--- via LCTG
>     *Sent:* Monday, November 13, 2023 1:17 PM
>     *To:* 'David Lees' <joeoptics at gmail.com>; 'Robert Primak'
>     <bobprimak at yahoo.com>
>     *Cc:* 'Lex Computer Group' <lctg at lists.toku.us>; 'Steve Isenberg'
>     <smisenberg at gmail.com>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Lex Computer & Tech Group/LCTG] Looking for sites
>     blocked by paywalls or remove-ad-blockers
>
>     Exactly my thought.  We may be talking about large entities such
>     as the NY Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, etc. but if
>     we want them to continue to exist they need to be able to pay
>     their expenses and make some money.
>
>     -- Carl
>
>     *From:* LCTG <lctg-bounces+carllazarus=comcast.net at lists.toku.us>
>     *On Behalf Of *David Lees via LCTG
>     *Sent:* Monday, November 13, 2023 1:12 PM
>     *To:* Robert Primak <bobprimak at yahoo.com>
>     *Cc:* Lex Computer Group <lctg at lists.toku.us>; Steve Isenberg
>     <smisenberg at gmail.com>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Lex Computer & Tech Group/LCTG] Looking for sites
>     blocked by paywalls or remove-ad-blockers
>
>     You could also discuss the ethical issues of not paying for things
>     that people trying to make a living are doing?
>
>     David Lees
>     From Pixel 6 Pro
>
>     On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, 1:00 PM Robert Primak via LCTG
>     <lctg at lists.toku.us> wrote:
>
>         You are NOT committing any crime by using most evasion
>         techniques available to the general public (not tech-savvy
>         hackers).
>
>         I don't know what Steve has or had in mind, but no one can
>         take any legal actions against anyone for publicly discussing
>         these tactics.
>
>         Please refer to You Tube's Terms of Use and Zoom's code of
>         user conduct if in any further doubt. Other sites also have
>         terms of use.
>
>         -- Bob Primak
>
>         On Monday, November 13, 2023 at 12:52:44 PM EST, Steve
>         Isenberg via LCTG <lctg at lists.toku.us> wrote:
>
>         Gentlepeople,
>
>         After much consideration, discussing with several people, and
>         consulting with ChatGPT, I've decided _not_ to demonstrate
>         this.  We can discuss the situation on Wednesday's Potpourri
>         but I no longer feel comfortable giving a demonstration for
>         legal reasons.  My apologies.
>
>         I'm open to comments.
>
>         -steve
>
>         Here's what I've learned from ChatGPT:
>
>         Steve asks ChatGPT:
>
>         suppose I have found a way to get around a paywall without
>         paying or subscribing, or to get around a site's requirement
>         to disable all ad blockers without disabling ad blockers, and
>         I can do this only on my computer and without accessing or
>         tampering with the website. Am I committing a crime or doing
>         something that would subject me to a lawsuit or other legal
>         action by the website owner?
>
>         ChatGPT responds (edited):
>
>         Circumventing paywalls or other access restrictions without
>         authorization may be a violation of the website's terms of
>         service, which could potentially lead to legal consequences.
>         Additionally, in some jurisdictions, such actions could be
>         considered unauthorized access, hacking, or a violation of
>         computer security laws.
>         If you find a way to bypass paywalls and other measures that
>         protect the website content without permission, it may be seen
>         as a violation of the website's rights and could result in
>         legal action.
>
>         I asked Aria the same question and it responds(edited):
>
>         It's important to note that bypassing paywalls or
>         circumventing a website's requirements without permission may
>         be considered unethical or even illegal in some jurisdictions.
>         Here are a few points to consider:
>         Websites have the right to protect their content and enforce
>         their terms of service.
>         Unauthorized access to paid content or finding ways to bypass
>         paywalls may violate copyright laws or terms of service
>         agreements.
>         Engaging in such activities could potentially subject you to
>         legal action by the website owner, such as a lawsuit or other
>         legal consequences.
>
>         Harry asked a similar question addressing only circumventing
>         paywalls, and got the response (edited):
>
>         Bypassing a paywall of a website without a subscription could
>         potentially be considered a violation of the website's terms
>         of service or terms of use. It may also infringe upon
>         copyright laws or other applicable laws, depending on the
>         jurisdiction. Engaging in such activities could potentially
>         have legal consequences, including the possibility of facing
>         legal action from the website owner. It is always advisable to
>         respect the terms and conditions set by website owners and to
>         seek proper legal means to access content.
>
>         On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:01 PM Robert Primak
>         <bobprimak at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>             The Boston Globe and the New York Times hide a lot of
>             their content.
>
>             Then there's the somewhat more problematic case of You Tube.
>
>             -- Bob Primak
>
>             On Monday, November 13, 2023 at 08:25:34 AM EST, Steve
>             Isenberg via LCTG <lctg at lists.toku.us> wrote:
>
>             Gentlepeople,
>
>             This Wednesday as part of the presentation I plan to show
>             how to proceed to web sites that prevent you from
>             accessing their content unless you (a) remove all of your
>             ad-blockers, or (b) subscribe or pay to see the content
>             (paywalls).
>
>             Could you send me (and not the list) the URL of sites you
>             have run into that block your access, and I'll add them to
>             the list I'll use as demonstrations.
>
>             Thanks,
>
>             -steve
>
>             ===============================================
>             ::The Lexington Computer and Technology Group Mailing List::
>             Reply goes to sender only; Reply All to send to list.
>             Send to the list: LCTG at lists.toku.us      Message
>             archives: http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/
>             To subscribe: email lctg-subscribe at toku.us To unsubscribe:
>             email lctg-unsubscribe at toku.us
>             Future and Past meeting information: http://LCTG.toku.us
>             <http://LCTG.toku.us>
>             List information:
>             http://lists.toku.us/listinfo.cgi/lctg-toku.us
>             This message was sent to bobprimak at yahoo.com.
>             Set your list options:
>             http://lists.toku.us/options.cgi/lctg-toku.us/bobprimak@yahoo.com
>
>         ===============================================
>         ::The Lexington Computer and Technology Group Mailing List::
>         Reply goes to sender only; Reply All to send to list.
>         Send to the list: LCTG at lists.toku.us     Message archives:
>         http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/
>         To subscribe: email lctg-subscribe at toku.us To unsubscribe:
>         email lctg-unsubscribe at toku.us
>         Future and Past meeting information: http://LCTG.toku.us
>         <http://LCTG.toku.us>
>         List information: http://lists.toku.us/listinfo.cgi/lctg-toku.us
>         This message was sent to bobprimak at yahoo.com.
>         Set your list options:
>         http://lists.toku.us/options.cgi/lctg-toku.us/bobprimak@yahoo.com
>
>         ===============================================
>         ::The Lexington Computer and Technology Group Mailing List::
>         Reply goes to sender only; Reply All to send to list.
>         Send to the list: LCTG at lists.toku.us     Message archives:
>         http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/
>         To subscribe: email lctg-subscribe at toku.us To unsubscribe:
>         email lctg-unsubscribe at toku.us
>         Future and Past meeting information: http://LCTG.toku.us
>         <http://LCTG.toku.us>
>         List information: http://lists.toku.us/listinfo.cgi/lctg-toku.us
>         This message was sent to joeoptics at gmail.com.
>         Set your list options:
>         http://lists.toku.us/options.cgi/lctg-toku.us/joeoptics@gmail.com
>
>
> ===============================================
> ::The Lexington Computer and Technology Group Mailing List::
> Reply goes to sender only; Reply All to send to list.
> Send to the list:LCTG at lists.toku.us       Message archives:http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/
> To subscribe: emaillctg-subscribe at toku.us   To unsubscribe: emaillctg-unsubscribe at toku.us
> Future and Past meeting information:http://LCTG.toku.us
> List information:http://lists.toku.us/listinfo.cgi/lctg-toku.us
> This message was sent tor.w.wagner at verizon.net.
> Set your list options:http://lists.toku.us/options.cgi/lctg-toku.us/r.w.wagner@verizon.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.toku.us/pipermail/lctg-toku.us/attachments/20231113/71d6df3b/attachment.htm>


More information about the LCTG mailing list